Skip to main content

Reader Response


Reader-response is a kind of essay used to express and defend a thoughtful reaction to what (poem, short story, novel essay, or other forms of text) someone has read. As a reaction to a text, in which a reader examines, explains, and defends his personal reaction to a text, reader response is also called a “reaction paper”. A reader-response is therefore more than just a summary. It explores why a reader likes or dislikes the reading, explains whether she/he agrees or disagrees with the author, identifies the reading's purpose, and criticizes the text.

Reader-response is based on the theory which emphasizes the reader's significant role in the reading process and in the creation of meaning. Reader-response diverts the emphasis away from the text as the sole determiner of meaning to the significance of the reader in analyzing and studying the meaning or the interpretation of texts (Bressler, 1999). While reading, a reader creates her or his own meaning through a “transaction” with the text based on personal associations. The reader is not a passive receiver of information or meaning. He or she actively participates in the creation of a text's meaning.

As an essay, a reader-response is more than just a summary. It also expresses an individual reader’s own view on a text and how s/he sees her/his role as a reader. Thus, a reader response covers two main essentials: the summary of what the readers read and the reader’s reaction to the text. The reaction can be one or more of: (1) agreement/disagreement with the ideas in the text; (2) reaction to how the ideas in the text relate to the reader’s own experience; (3) reaction to how ideas in the text relate to other things she/he has read; (4) analysis on the author and audience; and (5) an evaluation of how the text attempts to persuade the reader and whether it is effective.

Since a reader response accentuates on the importance of the reader’s role in interpreting texts and all readers bring their own emotions, concerns, life experiences, and knowledge to their reading, no reader response essay will emerge identical with another. Fifty students assigned to respond to a single text will produce fifty subjective and unique reader response essays. Although these essays are varied in ideas, as far as they are written in the correct format, all of them could be accepted as adequate interpretation.

The length of a reader response essay is quite relative. It could be some hundreds to some thousands of words in length, depending on the complexity of the text responded and the depth of the expected response. Despite that, it generally consists of three basic components, but each section can consist of more than one paragraph.

Section one is used as an introductory part in which necessary information about the text and its author is identified. This section generally starts with a brief summary of the text, which covers the title, author’s name, and his/her main point—i.e. theme, main message, or central idea of the work. The summary should therefore not retell everything that happened in the work. It should express what the reader thinks the author is trying to get across.

Section two is the core of a reader response essay for it shows its writer’s reading thinking. This section comprises a good part of the reader’s response.  The reader may need to return to the work s/he read and notes the points s/he marked as significant.  She/he should pick one that s/he is “connected” with (based on experiences, interests, or knowledge) and write a response to it/them.  S/he can copy part of the passage into her/his essay (using quotes when needed) or just paraphrase the idea s/he thought was the most engaging.  S/he should respond to the idea of the passage but does not simply summarize the reading.  S/he should think about how the passage s/he chose relates to the author’s main point (from section one). It is best to try to stick to one specific point instead of trying to include everything the author addresses. That point, however, should be completely developed.

Section three reflects the writer’s goal as a reader. This is the place where s/he reacts to the point(s) analyzed in section two. S/he does this by answering some of the following questions. Is it a point I agree with?  Did it remind me of something else I have read or heard?  Does it remind me of any current issues or problems?  Does it encourage me to read other works by the same author, or not? Why or why not? To whom would you recommend this text?

To see how these concepts work in a reader response essay, look at the example provided below. It is written as a reading response to Jason Bocarro’s short story entitled A Long Walk Home. Before you study the example, you are suggested to read the short story first. It can be accessed here


Bocarro, J. (1997). In Canfield, J., Hanson, M.C. and Kirberger, K. (1997). Chicken soup for the teenage soul. Deerfield Beach, Florida: Health Communications.)

Bressler, C.E. (1999). Literary criticism: An introduction to theory and practices. USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Interesting short stories to read and respond to (click the title to get to the story): 

  1. Jason Bocarro’s A Long Walk Home
  2. Zona Gale’s Bill
  3. Hemingway’s Old Man at the Bridge
  4. Matsuo Basho’s The Aged Mother
  5. Murong Xuecun’s The Accident
  6. Raymond Carver’s Popular Mechanics
  7. Mohamed El-Bisatie’ A Conversation from the Third Floor
  8. Gabriel García Márquez’ One of These Days
  9. Colette’s The Other Wife
  10. Kate Chopin’s The story of an Hour
  11. Donald Barthelme’ The School
  12. Dostoevsky’s The Beggar Boy at Christ’s Christmas Tree
  13. Tolstoy’s Papa Panov’s Special Christmas
  14. O’ henry’s The Last Leaf
  15. Hans Christian Andersen’s The Last Dreamof Old Oak
  16. Chekov’s The Beggar


  1. I love this post. The guidelines are clear and easy to follow, and the sample, "A Long Walk Home" is well selected. What a touchy short story!

  2. This articel help me how to respond the text correctly because as long as I respond the articel before, I dont know where I started and where I ended.

    Acording what I had read, I agree when we read a text, we will respond the text according to our background, our knowledge to what we had read to another articel and according to our feeling in time.

    But I think when we read something articel we try to figure out our opinion and our feeling acording to text. And we conclude the articel what we have got acording to the text.

    And I think, when we try to give a question it means we responds the text and when we compare the text to another, we try to to respond the text

    From_iman setia harefa

  3. After reading the article above, I agree with what it said that we as readers are very important whose names respond to what we have read. this is the way we interact between writers and readers to see responses and opinions made according to personal views about what they have read.

    Responding to someone's work is a way for us to gain insight into what we read. not just getting information from the existing text, but anyone can respond and freely express their ideas and ideas so that the author can understand the pros and cons of the work he has created and for the reader to understand that when reading something, we realize that by giving us a response, there will be interactions that connect one another to discuss a problem together.

  4. This article makes me understand how to read response? There are so many that I realized when I read there were errors but after I read this article I understood some. one of which we read creates meaning through transactions with text based on personal interaction. and also we read not only passive recipients of information or meaning.
    I understand we read includes two important summaries of what we read and the reactions when we read against the text. In response to reading time we must emphasize the importance of our role in reading the text and bring emotions, worries, life experiences, and knowledge to the reading.
    then consists of three basic components, but each section can consist of more than one paragraph of text written by an author. such as an introductory section where necessary information about the text and its author is identified. and also the essence of the essay reader's response because it shows the author's reading thoughts.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Types and Functions of Plot

Type of Plots  The plot used in fictions can be differentiated into four types: linear, episodic, parallel, and flashback. The most common plot employed in short stories is the linear plot. Some short stories, though quite rarely, also use flashback plot. The episodic and parallel plots, however, are found only in long fiction, i.e. novels. Short storied do not use episodic and parallel plots because short stories normally concentrate on a single event with a very limited number of characters, while episodic and parallel plots include a series of events or more than one plot. The following section describes each plot briefly. The Linear Plot The linear plot (sometimes is also called dramatic or progressive plot) presents action or occurrences chronologically. It typically starts with an exposition (or introduction to the setting and characters) and the conflict. After that, the rising action follows which leads to a climax. Soon after the climax, falling action emerges which brings

Identifying a Research Problem (and Writing the Statement of the Problem)

  Research is essentially a problem-driven process. It starts and focuses on a specific problem or phenomenon. During the research process, data is collected and theories are elaborated to explain the problem. In other words, identifying and determining the problem to study is the first and the most important aspect to deal with in undertaking research. Thus, the research problem is the foundation of a research project. If the foundation is shaky the entire project is doomed to failure. Despite its critical importance, identifying and stating a research problem are the most challenging aspects of undertaking research, especially for novice researchers. This might be due to an insufficient understanding of how to identify and write for a study. This article describes research problem identification as the first step of a research process. It starts by describing what a research problem is, how to identify it, and where to obtain it. Then it briefly probes the criteria for determining a

An Analysis of the Theme of Hemingway’s “Old Man at the Bridge”

  An Analysis of the Theme of Hemingway’s “Old Man at the Bridge” Introduction The theme is one of the most interesting elements of fiction, including a short story. It refers to the central idea or meaning that the author wants to convey to the readers. Some stories convey a single theme, but some other stories have several themes. Since short stories are related to human life, Alternbend and Lewis (1966, p. 78) define theme as “The general vision of life or the more explicit proposition about human experience that literature conveys”. In relation to this, one of the easiest ways to determine the theme of a short story is by asking ourselves, “What does the story say about life? The theme of fiction is generally presented through the other elements of fiction, particularly the plot and characterization. This article is a venture to analyze the theme of Hemingway’s Old Man at the Bridge . This story is interesting to analyze due to two reasons. First, it is based on Hemingway’s exp